This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
NATIVE EXOHUMAN BEHAVIVOR SUPERVISION IN THE GAMMA AGE
Overview
Article 6 of the Peace Treaty of 2631, established after the Great War, designates ExoHumans as “guests” on VOI 700 D. This status is conditional upon their indefinite compliance with the treaty’s provisions. To ensure adherence, ExoHumans are subject to regular inspections conducted by Native Supervisors from the former Alliance of Native Tribes. These inspections evaluate public life, governance, and cultural integration.
ExoHumans are required to cooperate fully with these reviews, providing access to documents, facilities, and information. Native Supervisors are obligated to ensure these inspections remain proportionate and non-intrusive, as stipulated in the Peace Treaty.
The Permanent Supervisor
Role and Authority
The Permanent Supervisor is the highest authority overseeing ExoHuman behavior on VOI 700 D, as mandated by the Peace Treaty of 2631. Although this role is absent from the Common Constitution, it supersedes all Federal Confederation structures in treaty compliance matters. The Supervisor ensures that ExoHumans adhere to the treaty's principles, safeguarding the planet's ecological and cultural balance.
Appointment and Tribal Politics
The Honga Tribe accepted the role of appointing the Permanent Supervisor during treaty negotiations, as other tribes were unwilling to assume the responsibility. This decision cemented the Honga's influence, but it also drew criticism from other tribes wary of Honga cultural dominance.
The Permanent Supervisor is not a hereditary or political leader but an elected figure within the Honga Tribe. They are chosen through a rigorous tribal process that considers their spiritual wisdom, understanding of ExoHuman behavior, and leadership abilities. The Supervisor acts as both a guide and an enforcer, bridging cultural divides while upholding the treaty's tenets.
Deputy Supervisors
The Native ExoHuman Behavior Supervision Program is supported by 20 Deputy Supervisors, strategically stationed across the four main ExoHuman settlements:
- New Kourou: 7 Deputies
- Firetown: 5 Deputies
- Hope: 5 Deputies
- Morningstar: 3 Deputies
Deputies are selected from various Native tribes, ensuring a balanced representation. They oversee daily inspections, review ExoHuman educational programs, and liaise with local governance structures. Each Deputy is trained in Honga philosophy and Native legal principles, ensuring their ability to uphold the treaty while fostering mutual understanding.
Methods and means of supervision
General Approach
The Honga's strategy emphasizes re-education and guidance, aiming to align ExoHumans with Native values.
Education and Cultural Integration
- Language and Philosophy: Honga Deputies are stationed in the Junior High and High School and at Danah Wanah University in New Kourou. They enforce mandatory Honga language courses (minimum two years) and philosophy/geography classes (one year), emphasizing Native concepts of balance and respect for nature. This linguistic focus aims to foster a deeper understanding of Native culture among humans.
- Unannounced Visits: Deputies conduct surprise classroom visits to ensure adherence to educational objectives.
- Media Oversight All human-authored media, including books and research, undergo Native review. Content deemed critical or ethically questionable is referred to the Permanent Supervisor.
- Press Freedom: The Weekly Gazette operates with minimal censorship due to an agreement emphasizing the importance of a free press. In contrast, the Firetown Post, labeled as “party information,” remains outside this arrangement but unofficially avoids direct interference.
- Governance and Infrastructure The Permanent Supervisor, supported by deputies, conducts annual reviews of government agencies, assessing key metrics such as birth rates and energy consumption with GAIA’s assistance. Surprise inspections are also possible.
Major construction projects require pre-approval from the Supervisor, who holds veto power over initiatives that contravene the treaty.
Criticism and Controversy
ExoHuman Perspective
Prominent members of the Individualist Party view Native supervision as patronizing. They accuse the Honga of overreach, particularly in education and governance, and criticize the Federal Court for favoring Native decisions. Calls for regulated complaint procedures and limits on supervision have gained traction among these dissenting voices.
Native Perspective
Many Natives remain skeptical of exohuman sincerity in honoring the treaty. Concerns persist that humans may exploit loopholes or revert to exploitative behaviors under future leadership. Some tribes criticize the Honga's dominant role, fearing it may lead to cultural hegemony, but none have challenged their authority as Permanent Supervisor.