THE SETTLER’S COUNCIL

The Settler’s Council was the highest legislative and judicial institution of the Free State of Settlers in the Beta Age (03 Oct 2625–16 Apr 2631). It drafted laws by referendum, served as a court of last appeal for Criminal and Civil Code violations, and directed the Guarding Troopers to enforce its rulings. The Council’s headquarters was located in New Kourou.

• Composition: Five elected councillors, serving two-year terms.
• Eligibility: Any adult citizen could stand for election.
• First Election: December 2625.

Councillors were chosen by direct popular vote; proposals for new laws originated from citizen ballots posted at the headquarters mailbox and ratified by household referenda.

• Legislation: Transformed prioritized citizen proposals into bills; passed laws by majority and published them for enforcement.
• Judicial Authority: Acted as the supreme court — hearing appeals from local Guarding Trooper stations, conducting trials for major offences, and issuing final sentences (exile, penal labor, restitution, or, in extreme cases, execution).
• Enforcement: Instructed Guarding Troopers to carry out arrests, confiscations, and punishments; maintained a central Register of Judgments.
• Referenda Oversight: Organized and tallied quarterly referenda on new proposals; ensured all laws reflected the settlers’ will.

To bridge the distances between scattered settlements and ensure both lawmaking and major legal disputes were handled transparently, the Settler’s Council and all five Contact Persons followed a strict quarterly cycle. These sessions served not only to enact new legislation but also to adjudicate appeals from across the Free State of Settlers.

• Local Proposal Collection: In the two weeks preceding each session, Contact Persons gathered and tabulated the outcome of their settlement’s referendum on locally prioritized issues (up to three topics per settlement).
• Council Drafting: Simultaneously, Councilors prepared any new draft laws or amendments they wished to advance to the settlements for ratification.

Held at the Settler’s Council Building, these meetings followed a four-part agenda:

• Submission of Local Proposals: Each Contact Person formally presented their settlement’s top three referendum results, explaining local needs and urging Council discussion.
• Presentation of Council Proposals: Councilors introduced any new bills or code amendments. After debate, each draft was tabled for local ratification.
• Judicial Appeals Hearing: Major criminal or civil appeals escalated from local Guarding Trooper stations were argued before the full Council, with the Contact Person of the appellant’s settlement present as liaison.
• Final Deliberation & Scheduling: The Council voted to adopt local proposals that had already passed local referenda, recorded judicial rulings, and scheduled all Council-originated drafts for immediate local referenda.

After the assembly adjourned:

• Citizen Balloting: Contact Persons organized a two-week, settlement-wide vote on each Council-originated bill. Voting stations were overseen by Guarding Troopers to guarantee fairness.
• Certification & Reporting: Once ballots were counted, results were certified by the local Station Commander and sent back to the Council ahead of the next quarterly session.

• Law Adoption: Any proposal—local or Council-originated—that secured a simple majority in its referenda was formally ratified at the subsequent quarterly meeting and entered into the official Statute Roll.
• Publication: New laws and court rulings were posted at each Community Center and dispatched by courier to every settlement.
• Enforcement Directives: The Council issued orders to the Guarding Troopers network for implementation of both new statutes and judicial sentences.

Between sessions, Contact Persons and Station Commanders maintained regular communication with the Council’s Clerk, submitting interim reports on enforcement challenges, public feedback, and urgent petitions that might require special consideration before the next formal cycle.

This robust, participatory framework ensured that every law—and every major legal dispute—reflected both local sentiment and colony-wide consensus, binding the Free State’s widely dispersed communities into a cohesive, self-governing polity.

• 2625 till 2627: Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Hèctor Tènoch Morales, Teimuraz Levanishvili, Robert Deuville
• 2627 until 2629: Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Hèctor Tènoch Morales, Eiko Bakken, Robert Deuville
• 2629 bis 2631: Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Kazuko Tanaka, Eiko Bakken, Teniel lozano

The Settler’s Council is a prime setting for narrative depth and moral complexity in Beta Age campaigns. As both a legislative and judicial authority, it offers a stage for political drama, legal showdowns, and public participation. Whether players are influencing policy, uncovering corruption, or navigating the limits of democracy in a resource-scarce society, the Council provides fertile ground for stories of agency and consequence.

• Three settler families involved in the disputed construction of Fisherpoint have been taken hostage by the Orlanda Tribe. In a chilling message, the Orlanda demand that all settlers abandon the area immediately — or the hostages will be fed to the Kardar, a carnivorous predator lurking in the swamps. With public opinion divided and fearing escalation, the Settler’s Council holds a secret vote and decides to authorize a covert rescue mission. The players are handpicked for this sensitive operation: extract the hostages without igniting a war. Stealth, negotiation, or bold tactics — how they act could determine whether the Orlanda retaliate or retreat …

• The exohuman Beta Age
• Free State of Settlers
• The exohuman governmental and legal system during the Beta Age
• Settler's Council Building