User Tools

Site Tools


settler_s_council

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
settler_s_council [2025/06/24 11:52] adminsettler_s_council [2025/12/28 14:27] (current) – [Overview] admin
Line 3: Line 3:
 ====== THE SETTLER’S COUNCIL ====== ====== THE SETTLER’S COUNCIL ======
  
 +{{ :settlers_council_scenic_2d.png?direct&400|}}
 ===== Overview ===== ===== Overview =====
  
-The Settler’s Council was the highest legislative and judicial institution of the [[free_state_of_settlers|Free State of Settlers]] in the [[beta_age|Beta Age]] (03 Oct 2625–16 Apr 2631). It drafted laws by referendum, served as a court of last appeal for [[criminal_code_of_the_free_state_of_settlers|Criminal]] and [[civil_code_of_the_free_state_of_settlers|Civil Code]] violations, and directed the [[guarding_troopers|Guarding Troopers]] to enforce its rulings. The Council’s headquarters stood in [[new_kourou|New Kourou]].+The Settler’s Council was the highest legislative and judicial institution of the [[free_state_of_settlers|Free State of Settlers]] in the [[beta_age|Beta Age]] (03 Oct 2625–16 Apr 2631). It drafted laws by referendum, served as a court of last appeal for [[criminal_code_of_the_free_state_of_settlers|Criminal]] and [[civil_code_of_the_free_state_of_settlers|Civil Code]] violations, and directed the [[guarding_troopers|Guarding Troopers]] to enforce its rulings. The Council’s headquarters was located in [[new_kourou|New Kourou]].
  
 ===== Democratic Formation ===== ===== Democratic Formation =====
Line 22: Line 23:
   * **Referenda Oversight:** Organized and tallied quarterly referenda on new proposals; ensured all laws reflected the settlers’ will.   * **Referenda Oversight:** Organized and tallied quarterly referenda on new proposals; ensured all laws reflected the settlers’ will.
  
-===== Operational Procedures =====+===== Operational Procedures: Quarterly Legislative & Judicial Sessions =====
  
-Originally modeled on the Last Frontier’s digital “Shipwide Net,” the Council adapted:+To bridge the distances between scattered settlements and ensure both lawmaking and major legal disputes were handled transparently, the Settler’s Council and all five [[contact_person|Contact Persons]] followed a strict quarterly cycle. These sessions served not only to enact new legislation but also to adjudicate appeals from across the Free State of Settlers.
  
-  * **Proposal Submission (Weeks 1–6):** Citizens deposited legislative suggestions at the headquarters mailbox. +==== 1. Preparation Agenda Setting ====
-  * **Review Publication (Weeks 7–8):** Councilors vetted submissions and distributed printed ballots to every household. +
-  * **Referendum (Weeks 9–10):** Households returned “yes/no” votes; proposals winning a simple majority advanced to draft bills. +
-  * **Council Deliberation (Weeks 11–12):** Councillors debated and finalized legislation or scheduled judicial sessions for appeal cases.+
  
-In judicial mattersappellants petitioned the Council; hearings were publicevidence presented by Guarding Trooper investigators, and judgments recorded in the Register.+  * **Local Proposal Collection:** In the two weeks preceding each sessionContact Persons gathered and tabulated the outcome of their settlement’s referendum on locally prioritized issues (up to three topics per settlement). 
 +  * **Council Drafting:** SimultaneouslyCouncilors prepared any new draft laws or amendments they wished to advance to the settlements for ratification.
  
 +==== 2. Quarterly Assembly in New Kourou ====
  
-===== Members of the Settler`s Council  =====+Held at the Settlers Council Building, these meetings followed a four-part agenda:
  
-**2625 till 2627:** Jermaine ForsterTayada CharoensukHèctor Tènoch MoralesTeimuraz LevanishviliRobert Deuville+  * **Submission of Local Proposals:** Each Contact Person formally presented their settlement’s top three referendum resultsexplaining local needs and urging Council discussion. 
 +  * **Presentation of Council Proposals:** Councilors introduced any new bills or code amendments. After debateeach draft was tabled for local ratification. 
 +  * **Judicial Appeals Hearing:** Major criminal or civil appeals escalated from local Guarding Trooper stations were argued before the full Council, with the Contact Person of the appellant’s settlement present as liaison. 
 +  * **Final Deliberation & Scheduling:** The Council voted to adopt local proposals that had already passed local referendarecorded judicial rulingsand scheduled all Council-originated drafts for immediate local referenda.
  
-**2627 until 2629:** Jermaine ForsterTayada CharoensukHèctor Tènoch MoralesEiko BakkenRobert Deuville+==== 3. Local Referenda & Validation ==== 
 + 
 +After the assembly adjourned: 
 + 
 +  * **Citizen Balloting:** Contact Persons organized a two-week, settlement-wide vote on each Council-originated bill. Voting stations were overseen by Guarding Troopers to guarantee fairness. 
 +  * **Certification & Reporting:** Once ballots were counted, results were certified by the local Station Commander and sent back to the Council ahead of the next quarterly session. 
 + 
 +==== 4. Enactment, Publication & Enforcement ==== 
 + 
 +  * **Law Adoption:** Any proposal—local or Council-originated—that secured a simple majority in its referenda was formally ratified at the subsequent quarterly meeting and entered into the official Statute Roll. 
 +  * **Publication:** New laws and court rulings were posted at each Community Center and dispatched by courier to every settlement. 
 +  * **Enforcement Directives:** The Council issued orders to the Guarding Troopers network for implementation of both new statutes and judicial sentences. 
 + 
 +==== 5. Ongoing Oversight ==== 
 + 
 +Between sessions, Contact Persons and Station Commanders maintained regular communication with the Council’s Clerk, submitting interim reports on enforcement challenges, public feedbackand urgent petitions that might require special consideration before the next formal cycle. 
 + 
 +This robustparticipatory framework ensured that every law—and every major legal dispute—reflected both local sentiment and colony-wide consensusbinding the Free State’s widely dispersed communities into a cohesiveself-governing polity. 
 + 
 +===== Members of the Settler`s Council  =====
  
-**2629 bis 2631:** Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Kazuko Tanaka, Eiko Bakken, Teniel lozano+  * **2625 till 2627:** Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Hèctor Tènoch Morales, Teimuraz Levanishvili, Robert Deuville 
 +  * **2627 until 2629:** Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Hèctor Tènoch Morales, Eiko Bakken, Robert Deuville 
 +  * **2629 bis 2631:** Jermaine Forster, Tayada Charoensuk, Kazuko Tanaka, Eiko Bakken, Teniel lozano
 ===== Tactical Advice for Dungeon Masters ===== ===== Tactical Advice for Dungeon Masters =====
  
settler_s_council.1750765976.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/06/24 11:52 by admin

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki