individualists
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| individualists [2024/11/18 07:32] – [Important political positions of the individualists] admin | individualists [2025/04/18 10:34] (current) – [THE INDIVIDUALISTS] admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | === Races | Factions, Tribes & Movements === | ||
| + | |||
| ====== THE INDIVIDUALISTS ====== | ====== THE INDIVIDUALISTS ====== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
| * **Rejection of the Peace Treaty:** The Individualists refuse to recognize the treaty, viewing it as a product of treason by the Anti-War Movement rather than a legitimate resolution. | * **Rejection of the Peace Treaty:** The Individualists refuse to recognize the treaty, viewing it as a product of treason by the Anti-War Movement rather than a legitimate resolution. | ||
| * **Restoration of the Free State of Settlers’ | * **Restoration of the Free State of Settlers’ | ||
| - | * Ideals:** The Individualists aim to re-establish the decentralized governance model of the Free State, with reduced federal oversight. | + | * Ideals:** The Individualists aim to re-establish the decentralized governance model of the Free State of Settlers, with reduced federal oversight. |
| - | * **Restoration of the Human Settlement Plan:** The Individualists are advocating the expansion of the exohuman industry in line with the Human Settlement Plan (HSP). | + | * **Restoration of the Human Settlement Plan:** The Individualists are advocating the expansion of the exohuman industry in line with the [[human_settlement_plan_hsp|Human Settlement Plan (HSP)]]. |
| * **Economic Autonomy:** The Individualists seek to reintegrate the principles of the HSP, viewing it as the blueprint for building a strong and independent human civilization. | * **Economic Autonomy:** The Individualists seek to reintegrate the principles of the HSP, viewing it as the blueprint for building a strong and independent human civilization. | ||
| - | ==== Election results and top candidates of the Individualists since the coming into force of the Gamma Age Constitution ==== | ||
| - | * **2632;** In the first elections after the peace treaty came into force, the Individualists and their top candidate | + | ===== The Philosophical Divide: Communards vs. Individualists ===== |
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | ===== Relations with the Native Tribes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Individualists’ stance on the Native Tribes is pragmatic but often criticized as dismissive. They argue for prioritizing human interests while maintaining a transactional relationship with the Natives as laborers | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Native Tribes view the Individualists cautiously, particularly due to campaign rhetoric that occasionally veers into xenophobia. Complaints about inflammatory slogans or posters have been filed with the Supreme Council of the People, but the party has skillfully navigated these controversies without alienating | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Firetown and Hope: The Party’s Power Bases ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Firetown: A Historical Stronghold ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Firetown|Firetown]] has been the backbone of the Individualists since the party’s inception. Its industrial character, coupled with dissatisfaction over the Communards’ proposed deindustrialization plans, has made the reservation a natural fit for the Individualist agenda. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Economic Focus:** Firetown’s reliance on mining and geothermal energy aligns with the Individualists’ push for industrial growth and economic autonomy. | ||
| + | * **Cultural Resistance: | ||
| + | * **Leadership Base:** Prominent Individualist leaders like James Mc Antie and Jamal Johanson have hailed from Firetown, further solidifying its status as the party’s political hub. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Hope: A Growing Base of Support ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Hope|Hope]] has emerged as a key battleground for the Individualists in recent years. Its agricultural focus and reliance on manual labor have created fertile ground for the party’s critique of Communard policies, particularly in resource allocation and technological stagnation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Agricultural Advocacy:** The Individualists’ promise to modernize Hope’s agricultural infrastructure through capitalist investments has gained traction among voters. | ||
| + | * **Resistance to Federal Oversight: | ||
| + | * **Economic Vision:** By positioning Hope as a potential trading hub for agricultural products, the Individualists have offered a vision of growth that contrasts with the Communards’ sustainability-focused approach. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== A Divided Federal Confederation ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The political rift between the Communards and the Individualists has deepened, creating a stark division within the Federal Confederation. This divide is most apparent in the Mayor’s Council, where the two factions dominate opposing sides: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Lack of Compromise: | ||
| + | * **Rising Tensions:** The political atmosphere grows increasingly volatile, with accusations, | ||
| - | * **2634:** In the second election, the Individualists ran again with Thabo " | + | This fracturing poses a significant threat to the stability of the Federal Confederation, as the ideological conflict between |
| - | * **2636:** In the first election without | + | ===== Election Results in the Federal Council ===== |
| + | * **2632;** In the first elections after the Peace Treaty came into force, the Individualists and their top candidate [[tony_forster| Thabo " | ||
| - | ==== Political perceptions of the party by Native Tribes ==== | + | * **2634:** Forster’s continued leadership earned |
| - | The Native Tribes are quite critical of the individualists. However, since the peace treaty stipulates that the Natives will not interfere in the internal affairs of the people as long as the Natives are not harmed by the people, they allow the Individualists | + | * **2636:** In the first election without |
| + | ===== Notable Individualist Politicians and Protagonists ===== | ||
| - | Nevertheless, | + | * [[sam_darkansaw|Jamal Johanson:]] Candidate for Supreme Councilor |
| + | * [[tony_forster|Thabo " | ||
| + | * [[decker_bolton|Decker Bolton]]: Mayor of Hope (2634–2638), | ||
| + | * [[lucien_garcia|Lucien Garcia:]] [[local_sheriff|Local Sheriff]] of Firetown since 2632, a staunch advocate for law enforcement aligned with Individualist values. | ||
| + | * [[arya_delacroix|Arya Delacroix]]: | ||
| + | ===== Related Pages and Further Information ===== | ||
| - | Such cases were usually settled discreetly, so as not to radicalize the Individualist voters unnecessarily. | + | * [[Free State of Settlers|Free State of Settlers]] |
| + | * [[Human Settlement Plan (HSP)|Human Settlement Plan (HSP)]] | ||
| + | * [[the_gamma_age|Gamma Age]] | ||
| + | * [[Federal Confederation|Federal Confederation]] | ||
| + | * [[Federal Council|Federal Council]] | ||
| + | * [[mayor_s_council|Mayor' | ||
| + | * [[communards|Communard Party]] | ||
| + | * [[Firetown|Firetown]] | ||
| + | * [[Hope|Hope]] | ||
| - | Normally, however, the party of individualists masters the tightrope walk between what is just barely permitted and what is ambiguous and suggestive. | ||
individualists.1731915151.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/11/18 07:32 by admin